|
Go to Project History and CHA Concerns
Go to the Media Alert/Resolution to Board
of Supervisors
Go to Reponse to PG&E Letter
Go to How to Get Involved
View EMF Fact Sheet
View Route Options
Last Friday night, representatives from Lucasfilm Ltd. sent out
an electronic note that included a letter from PG&E on the Lucas
Powerline. The PG&E letter provided no new information to assuage
our fears and concerns, but was obviously written in an attempt
to minimize concerns that have been repeatedly voiced by neighbors
on the new Lucas project. You can see their communication and our
response below.
The failure of PG&E or Lucasfilm Ltd. to DIRECTLY address the
issues we have consistently raised verbally and in writing adds
to our skepticism. There is much that can be debated about how PG&E
has conducted themselves in this process. Many of us feel they have
repeatedly failed to comply with the law. Regardless of the legality,
two of the most important issues for the neighbors on the Lucas
Powerline are: (1) the dysfunctional planning process and, (2) the
health and safety concerns.
Planning Process
In the planning process, there has been no public review of the
decision-making involved with bringing an industrial amount of power
through an existing residential and small business neighborhood.
Alternatives exist that have not been explored or explained to us.
The current route, which is 8 blocks out of the way, appears to
have been driven by the need to place a capacitor close to but outside
the Presidio. WE have now been told that the capacitor will be placed
in the Presidio, creating additional questions about the selected
route and the decisions behind it.
The City and County of San Francisco supports our position with
the adoption of Resolution No. 0032016 by the Board of Supervisors
on December 16, 2003, to request "
Lucasfilm Ltd. and
Pacific Gas & Electric Co., Inc. to work with the community
on alternatives to its Bay-Fillmore-Filbert-Lyon route for supplying
power to the Letterman Digital Arts Center in the Presidio, and
to ensure that the route reduces impacts on San Francisco neighborhoods
to the greatest extent possible
and
that best protects
the health and safety of San Francisco's residents."
Health and Safety
Concerned Neighbors have focused on the TOTAL capacity of power,
or wattage that the Lucas Powerline could carry: 24 million watts
= 24 megawatts = 24 mW -- not the
voltage (12,000 volts = 12 kV), which is the only measurement that
PG&E continually makes reference to. PG&E is building infrastructure
capable of running 24 megawatts of power through an existing residential
and small business neighborhood. City Administrator Bill Lee agrees
the this project, which includes two (2) conduits to carry two (2)
powerlines, should be treated as a 24 megawatt project and acknowledges
there is reason to be concerned with EMFs. PG&E spokespeople
confirmed at the Filbert/Lyon construction site on December 10,
that 24 megawatts is approximately the amount of power that would
be required for 24,000 homes. It is simply inappropriate for a residential
neighborhood.
Attached is a Fact Sheet on Electric and Magnetic Fields from the
California Department of Health Services that provides excellent
information. To summarize the applicable sections, it states that
high voltages produce strong electric fields, which are easily shielded.
Strong currents (resulting from high power consumption) produce
strong magnetic fields, which are not easily shielded or blocked.
Magnetic field strength falls off more rapidly from "point"
sources (such as appliances), which reach background levels at a
distance of 3-4 feet, than from "line" sources (powerlines),
which for distribution lines such as the Lucas Powerline reach background
levels only after a distance of 60 - 200 feet. As many of you can
see, the trench for the powerline running down Filbert Street is
less than 40 feet from many residents' front doors.
As noted in the DHS Fact Sheet, the California PUC and Department
of Health Services have not concluded that exposures to EMFs are
safe or are a health hazard, yet the results stated in the EMF and
the NIEHS Working Group Report to Congress disagrees. Titled Assessment
of Health Effects from Exposure to Power-Line Frequency Electric
and Magnetic Fields, "a majority of scientists on this working
group voted that the epidemiology studies of childhood leukemia
and residential EMF exposures provide enough evidence to classify
EMF as a possible human carcinogen."
Where to Go From Here
We are pleased that discussions are underway between the Presidio
Trust, Lucasfilm Ltd. and PG&E to locate the capacitors, one
for each powerline to be activated, in the Presidio. Nonetheless,
our concerns regarding the routing of the Lucas Powerline and the
decision process remain as strong as ever.
Our Goals Are:
1. Stop work on the Lucas Powerline, which contains 3 conduits,
2 for electric power
2. Open the project to public participation in the selection of
the route alternatives, and the evaluation of these alternatives
and mitigation measures
3. Locate all capacitors for the Lucas Powerline in the Presidio
To the residents and small business owners at the October 23, 2003
Community Meeting hosted by the Cow Hollow Association and Gavin
Newsom's Office, PG&E's Gary Tognozzi stated and Matt Lonner
agreed, that the only other location in San Francisco where an industrial
application goes through a residential neighborhood is Mission Bay.
Cow Hollow is not Mission Bay!
We challenge Lucasfilm Ltd. to stop treating this as a public relations
problem, but send someone with operational authority to discuss
the genuine remedies and solutions.
Sincerely,
Brooke Sampson
Concerned Neighbors on Fillmore, Filbert, and Lyon Streets

|