|
In
This Issue
Updates
Verizon
Wireless Base Station
- Neighbors Prevail...Verizon Files Lawsuit
The
Housing Element - City Passes Element, Next Step
Lucas
Powerline - PG&E/Lucas EMF Feeder Study
Undergrounding
Utility Wires on Greenwich and cross streets - Options
for Neighbors
New Topics
Candidate
Forum, District 2 Supervisor - October 18 at the Palace
of Fine Arts
Traffic
Calming Program - Reduce Disruption, Improve Safety
2004
Annual Meeting - Minutes from Meeting
Tell
a Friend - Become a Member
Next
Cow Hollow Board Meeting - October 5, 2004
The
Cow Hollow Association was established many years ago to protect
and preserve the residential character of one of San Francisco's
distinctive neighborhoods.
Verizon
Wireless Cellular Base Station
Neighbors Prevail...Verizon Files Lawsuit
On May 11th,
the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted unanimously (10-0,
Ammiano absent) to revoke the permit granted by the Planning Commission
for Verizon Wireless to erect a 3-G cellular site on top of the
Pacific Motor Inn (corner of Lombard and Broderick). After 9 months
of hearings, meetings and negotiations, the cohesive efforts of
many neighbors along Greenwich and surrounding streets, lead by
Mary Irene Zemanek and Lori Brooke, resulted in a victory that
many thought wasn't possible. Supervisor Alioto-Pier was instrumental
in our success by clearly supporting the neighborhood's position.
The victory was not long lasting. In mid-July, we learned from
a Deputy City Attorney that Verizon has filed a lawsuit against
the City for its recent decision in the antenna appeal for the
Pacific Motor Inn. According to the attorney, it is likely Verizon
will not pursue the lawsuit until the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
issues a decision in the MetroPCS v. City & County of SF case,
which concerns a 2002 Board of Supervisors decision to deny MetroPCS
antennas at 17th Ave. & Geary. The Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals has scheduled oral argument to take place in the MetroPCS
v. City & County of San Francisco case on Monday, October
4, likely sometime after 10:00 a.m. at 95 Seventh St. in San Francisco.
This is the first antenna-siting case to be determined by the
Ninth Circuit. It has far-reaching implications, not only locally
(if the City loses, then disputed antenna sites now in litigation
in the Sunset and Cow Hollow will be allowed to be installed),
but throughout California and beyond. After the hearing is held,
a decision will likely be issued at the end of this year or in
the early part of 2005. The hearing is open to the public.
Most recently at the July 20, 2004 Board of Supervisors meeting,
Supervisor Ma, along with Supervisors Ammiano and Dufty, called
for a hearing on issues related to the revision of the City's
antenna-siting guidelines. It was referred to the Land Use Committee,
which has heard this issue in the past, and whose current members
are Supervisors McGoldrick, Peskin and Maxwell. As soon as we
learn of a firm date for the hearing, we will pass it along. The
Land Use Committee generally meets Mondays at 1:00 p.m. in City
Hall.
This situation is further proof that we, as concerned neighbors,
need to pressure members of the Board of Supervisors to take action
that would eliminate the need for these appeals by strengthening
the City's antenna-siting guidelines. The CHA will remain involved
in this effort and keep you informed of any developments.
Back to Top
The
Housing Element
City
Passes Element, Next Step
Despite opposition from several San Francisco neighborhood organizations,
the San Francisco Housing Element has sailed through the Planning
Commission and the Board of Supervisors. The Housing Element is
a major part of San Francisco's General Plan that seeks to ensure
adequate housing for current and future San Franciscans.
Its chief proponent, Gerald Green, Director of the Planning Department
at that time, first presented the substance of the Housing Element
to Cow Hollow at our 2003 annual meeting. At that meeting, he forewarned
the members in attendance that the document would be controversial
and it certainly is.
The philosophical premise of the Housing Element is based on two
ideas:
(1) that the way to make housing in San Francisco more affordable
is to build more of it (up to 20,000 units). The single family residence
is an inefficient use of land and should be replaced with multi-family
buildings allowing for greater density at affordable prices, and
(2) a "public-transit first" policy takes precedence over
the current requirement of 1:1 off-street automobile parking considerations.
The plan has proven controversial because it threatens to increase
housing densities in residential neighborhoods like Cow Hollow without
an increase in parking, thus disturbing the neighborhood character.
Beyond that, this extensive plan to build 20,000 plus units was
done without an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), which is required
by State law. Despite the fact the Planning Department had EIRs
done in 1983 and 1990 for the previous Housing Elements, the Planning
Department simply issued what's called a Negative Declaration claiming
that any impacts on the environment would be speculative.
The Housing Element was also prepared without any input from the
neighborhoods that may be affected by the new policies. Although
the Coalition of San Francisco Neighborhoods (CSFN) did negotiate
amendments to the Housing Element with the Planning Department,
the appellants did not agree to those amendments and the effectiveness
of the amendments is doubtful.
For these reasons, and many others, neighborhood organizations
came together to appeal the Negative Declaration and to demand an
EIR. On May 13, 2004, the appellants, who included approximately
25 neighborhood organizations, testified at the Planning Commission
hearing in hopes that the Planning Commission would insist that
an EIR be prepared for the latest Housing Element.
However, the Planning Commission unanimously denied our appeal
and approved the Planning Department's decision to issue the Negative
Declaration in lieu of preparing an EIR. The Planning Commission
then heard arguments on the Housing Element itself. As expected,
the Commission approved the project without any consideration of
the appellants' arguments.
The appellants then appealed to the Board of Supervisors, requesting
an appeal of the Negative Declaration and the preparation of an
EIR. The hearing took place on June 29, 2004. Despite extensive
lobbying efforts, the appellants lost again with a 6-4 vote with
Supervisor Sandoval absent. Our votes came from Supervisors Hall,
Peskin, Ma and Alioto-Pier.
As it stands now, the appellants have written a letter to the State
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) detailing
why the Housing Element is not in compliance with state law. HCD
reviews the Housing Element for compliance. The appellants are raising
funds to commence a lawsuit to require an EIR before the City can
finalize or implement these new housing policies. The alliance of
neighborhoods has retained a noted environmental law specialist
to prepare the record and represent the appellants in the suit.
The lawyer will handle the lawsuit for a flat fee, which must be
raised quickly.
For further information and a more detailed analysis, visit the
Save Our Neighborhoods website at www.saveourneighborhoods.org.
If you would like to contribute to the lawsuit, you can complete
the form below and return it with your tax-deductible check payable
to Appeal Legal Fund, PHRA, 2443 Fillmore Street #192, San Francisco,
CA 94115. (Pacific Heights Residents Association is acting as depository).
In the event a lawsuit is not brought, your donation will be returned.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name____________________________________________Phone________________
Address___________________________________________Zip Code____________
E-Mail___________________________________________FAX________________
Neighborhood Organization__________________________Amount_______________
Back
to Top
Lucas
Powerline
PG&E/Lucas EMF Feeder Study
James Andrews, Electrical Engineer, and Kristen Sparrow, MD,
both of Mentor Associates, have initiated a comprehensive study
to demonstrate and record any increase in Electric and Magnetic
Fields (EMFs) along the Lucas Powerline - Lyon to Filbert to Pierce.
This study has been generously paid for by a number of Cow Hollow
residents and we thank you for your support. A complete list of
supporters will be distributed with the next Newsletter. Information
on contributing to this Study follows the Phase 1 information.
The Study will cover approximately one year's worth of readings
and analyses taken along the street and at critical points such
as taps and junction points. Any readings from the interiors of
homes along the route could be done on a case by case after the
"baseline" data is established. This can be arranged
by contact Mr. Andrews directly at 415.265.9334.
Phase 1
Update (7/12/04) by James Andrews, Mentor Associates and Cow Hollow
Resident
The main feeder along Filbert is now energized and was finally
switched on via one of the newly installed, underground "primary"
switches located in the sidewalk at the northeast corner of Filbert
at Divisadero. PG&E "heated up" the entire feeder
from the substation on Bay Street, and did not have to use that
new overhead "riser" tap in front of the Cow Hollow
Woodworks on Steiner at Filbert as an interim connection point
as we surmised.
As expected, when PG&E energized the feeder, the EMF readings
registered an initial increase along the Filbert portion of the
feeder to an average range of .8 to 1.4mG. Some areas at key locations
(i.e. over underground switches, etc.) are higher, but the fairly
low initial readings are in line with what we predicted and that
is encouraging. Initially "energizing" the new Lucas
Feeder has not significantly added to the existing EMF along North
Filbert/East Lyon, but the line is very minimally loaded now.
We need to carefully monitor any changes as the Lucas load is
steadily increased over the next several months.
The windows at the Lucas buildings 1-4 are almost all installed
and I'd expect their electrical contractor to begin testing the
"permanent" electrical system very soon. They will generally
leave a majority of the lights, etc. on to test the systems and
we'll try to get another full set of measurements along the feeder
to coincide with the increased load. The large, temporary transformers
being used for all of the "temporary construction service"
to the Lucas site are still in place and remain functional. Apparently,
they are not yet being supplied from the new main feeder.
The other "riser tap" (and transfer switch) at the intersection
of Lyon and Greenwich is still not complete and the large set
of 3 -1100kcm Aluminum cables are coiled on the pole. Curiously,
this existing wooden pole already has a riser on it, which is,
presumably, one of the existing main primary feeds for the Presidio.
It will be interesting to see when/if this existing feed is removed,
as combining two feeders and switches on a single pole like that
is generally not considered the best design for prudent "outage
prevention".
Also, along those lines, this "key" riser pole is directly
at the end of Greenwich and Lyon. This is a "T" intersection
for vehicle traffic and is also a tight left turn and stopping
point for the quite frequent #45 & #41 Muni Buses. Any unfortunate
accident involving the pole could leave the existing neighborhood
exposed to a prolonged power outage. With 2500-3000 new workers
expected at Lucas and all the new auto traffic that will result,
perhaps the wisdom of designing a key "riser" switch
on this rather vulnerable pole should have been more carefully
considered by PG&E.
As a result of CHA's efforts, PG&E finally located the large,
pad mounted "capacitor" behind the wall on the Presidio
property and not on a pole on our streets. It is installed just
inside the Presidio wall on Lyon just North of Filbert, and is
now operational and buzzing like crazy. Also, a realtor from Hill
& Co. did confirm to me that the plan is for the Letterman
Digital Arts Center buildings to be "one-third" subleased.
Attached are a few photos of that "riser" mentioned
above at Lyon/Greenwich the first one shows the specifications
including the "25KV" rating.
To Support
the PG&E/Lucas EMF Feeder Study
We are well on our way to our final fundraising goal of $10,000
to implement our projects for reducing the impacts of the Lucas
Powerline (Bay-Fillmore-Filbert-Lyon Streets) on our residential
neighborhood.
We heartily thank those of you who have:
1. mailed in your tax-deductible contribution to support our efforts,
or
2. volunteered their homes as part of the EMF study.
If you have not participated in our campaign, please mail your
TAX-DEDUCTIBLE contribution as soon as possible to:
Cow Hollow Association, Inc.*
Box 471136, San Francisco, CA 94147
Any contribution will be greatly appreciated. Please write FOCH-EMF
on your check.
* The Cow Hollow Association, Inc., with its tax-exempt status,
is acting as the fiscal sponsor to raise funds for this effort
- "Friends of Cow Hollow"
Back
to Top
Undergrounding
Utility Wires
Options
for Neighbors
Supervisor Alioto-Pier's office held a meeting on May 12, 2004
for neighborhoods who are interested in underground wiring. Representatives
from Greenwich Street and Jordan Park attended. Also present were
Lester Rose (PG&E) and Barbara Moy (DPW).
Rule 20A funds are typically used to underground districts. Rule
20A is funded through rate payers and funds are then allocated by
the State PUC. In 1996, a process began which legislated 42 miles
throughout the city of San Francisco. Due to the increased costs
of this project, San Francisco has had to borrow forward to 2018
to complete this project. Current estimated cost for this project
is $135 million.
As a result, this leaves other areas of San Francisco, who are not
part of the 42 miles, without access to 20A funds until 2018. Currently
there is no process in place to apply for 20A funds after 2018 and
we don't anticipate that DPW will institute a process anytime soon.
Supervisor Alioto-Pier arranged the meeting in order to share with
neighbors another process by which they could underground wires
through their own efforts. Costs would be born entirely by the neighbors
and could be amortized over a period of years through property tax
assessments. In order to do this it requires the following:
| * |
Establish a Business Improvement District by gathering
a minimum of 30% of the neighbor's signatures who are interested
in having wires undergrounded. |
| * |
Conduct an Engineering and Business Plan report
which includes:
- benefits added to property
- how the assessment will be allocated
- how the assessment will be funded
- why this is needed
- NOTE: cost of report can be incorporated into the bond |
| * |
Implement Legislation vote by ballot. Measure
must pass by 50% +1 of weighted votes. If the initial petition
has 50% +1 then a neighborhood does not need to go through an
election by ballot. |
| * |
The city of San Francisco would then work with
the neighborhood to issue tax free bonds to fund the undergrounding.
This is then assessed through property taxes and the neighborhood
decides on the length of time to repay. |
| * |
Cost per block for undergrounding is as follows:
- $500,000 for substructure
- $30,000 for streetlights
- $20,000 legislation and street light design
- Conversion cost for:
Single family home $2500
Two unit flat - $3500
Building - $6000-7000 |
Another option to pass legislation for undergrounding (that is
neighborhood funded) is to get a two-thirds majority vote by registered
voters in the proposed undergrounding area - called a Melarouse.
This option, according to Supervisor Alioto-Pier's office, is not
typically used.
As you can tell, this is going to be a difficult process and the
neighbors need to determine what efforts and costs they are willing
to take to make the undergrounding happen in this area. The CHA
will keep you informed of any efforts to begin this process.
Back
to Top
Candidate
Forum, District 2 Supervisor
October 18 at the Palace of Fine Arts Theatre
The November election is nearing
and do you know about the candidates for our District
2 Supervisor? Do you know where they stand on issues
of importance to our neighborhood such as the Housing
Element, Parking and Traffic, Antenna Siting Guidelines,
or the Impact of the Presidio?
To help you make an informed decision, the Cow Hollow
Association, Golden Gate Valley and Neighbors in Action
(NIA) will co-host a forum for District 2 Supervisor
candidates. Here is your chance to hear first hand
from the candidates who are competing to represent
our interests.
| Date |
Monday, October 18 |
|
| Place |
Palace of Fine Arts Theatre |
|
| Time |
6-7pm |
- Refreshments
- Lombard Beautification Discussion
- Parking & Traffic Discussion
|
|
7-9pm |
- District 2 Candidate Forum
|
See you there.
Reduce Disruption, Improve Safety
Cow Hollow Association board will soon be submitting an application
to the San Francisco Department of Parking and Traffic's Traffic
Calming Program. This program is designed to help neighborhoods,
through community planning processes, develop solutions to various
traffic hazards. Neighborhood-wide traffic calming improvements
are underway in Bernal Heights and are planned for Jordan Park
and Japantown. Specific projects, such as speed humps and traffic
circles, can be seen on West Clay Park, West Pacific, Cervantes,
and Page Street.
As relevant to Cow Hollow, the program recognizes the need to
reduce the hazards to residential neighborhoods from "cut-through"
traffic trying to save time by avoiding major arteries. The blocks
between the Presidio and Divisadero have experienced change in
the past year -- good for some blocks, bad for others. The closing
off of Lyon Street reduced much of the cut-through" traffic
using Lyon and Green Streets as a way to avoid some of the congestion
on Lombard and Divisadero. Baker Street soon saw increases, and
neighborhood efforts resulted in the installation of "calming"
poles designed to discourage the use of Baker as a substitute
for Lyon. Speeding taxis and other commercial drivers have been
observed in recent months roaring at inappropriate and unsafe
speeds up Broderick and along Filbert and Greenwich. When the
Lucasfilm Ltd. facility in the Presidio opens for business, we
expect further changes in neighborhood traffic -- and not reductions,
unfortunately.
We hope that by taking the pro-active step of working together
to develop solutions to Cow Hollow's traffic problems, we can
make Cow Hollow a safer place for walking, cycling and driving.
We will keep you informed of any neighborhood meetings to discuss
these issues with DPW.
For more information about the Traffic Calming Program, please
visit: http://www.ci.sf.ca.us/site/dpt_index.asp?id=13568.
Back
to Top
2004
Annual Meeting
Minutes
from Meeting
Cow Hollow Association
Annual Meeting, May 4, 2004
St. Francis Yacht club
The meeting was called to order by President
Tony Imhof at 6:15pm.
He introduced the current Board. The outgoing
Board members: Amanda Kirkwood, Terry Laurentine
and Alison Salzer were thanked. He also thanked
the informational booths that were represented:
- GGNRA/Presidio trust
- Doyle Drive and their video
- Marina Library Renovation
- EMF
- SAFE
- Save Our Neighborhoods, information on the
proposed Housing Element
The minutes of the May 6,2003 meeting were
approved as written.
Nominating Committee Report: Carol Livingston
Nominees for the Board were introduced. Nominated
for a two-year term were: Lori Brooke, Tony
Imhof, Brooke Sampson, and new members, Marina
Ehlers, Fredric Laurentine, and Catherine Stefani.
Continuing their second of two years were: Sue
Crawford, Charlie Dicke, Nancy Leavens, Peter
O'Hara and Elizabeth Traub. Motion to approve
was passed.
Carol reminded all members that we are a volunteer
organization and everyone is invited to our
monthly meetings and encouraged to become involved
with our neighborhood.
Treasurer's Report: Lori Brooke
Our balance at the beginning of May 2003 was
$11, 800.00. Our income is derived from membership
dues and our expenses include our annual party,
mailings, development of a website and a donation
to Save Our Neighborhoods. Our closing balance
as of April 30,2004 was $13,033.00.
Members were encouraged to provide the membership
chair with their e-mail address since this greatly
cuts down on expenses.
Presenter: Heather Fong, San Francisco Police
Chief
Chief Fong is a San Francisco native, has a
Master's Degree from San Francisco State, and
has been a member of the San Francisco Police
Force for 27 years. Currently we have 10 police
districts and the Force has an expanded presence
at Treasure Island and Hunter's Point because
of the development of housing.
Chief Fong detailed some of the innovations
in the Department:
-
More sophisticated computer
technology allows for improvement in administration
-
Crime reports are now being
filed electronically.
-
Implementation of a new crime
mapping system that allows for greater accountability
and evaluates high areas of crime so the districts
can adjust staffing.
-
A link to the Police Department
from the government website,
www.sfgov.org. This will allow citizens
to be more informed.
-
Greater emphasis on traffic
enforcement, especially speeding. The California
Highway patrol is now working with local law
enforcement. The motorcycle unit has expanded
as well as the neighborhood bicycle patrol.
-
And forthcoming: Continued
training for officers for crowd control and
protection for conferences and special events.
-
Outreach for expanded citizen
involvement through volunteer opportunities
and local community meetings.
-
The Department is working
closely with the Mayor's office, the Department
of Human Services and the Department of Health
on the problem of homeless people. Proposition
M prohibited aggressive panhandling and the
Department will be enforcing it. After prosecution
and conviction, people will be diverted to
the appropriate City service.
-
Cow Hollow, within the context
living in a major City is considered a safe
neighborhood.
Presenter: Michela Alioto-Pier, San Francisco
Supervisor, District #2
Supervisor Alioto-Pier graduated from UCLA with
a degree in Anthropology. She has been an aide
to Al Gore and has run for state office. Currently
she is on the Port Commission. She is a fifth
generation San Franciscan and is married with
two children.
Supervisor Alioto-Pier describes herself as
a voice for children and an advocate for the
disabled.
She is concerned about continued job development
and growth and the problem of affordable housing.
She would encourage the development of San Francisco
as a cruise ship port. Because San Francisco
is not considered a cargo port, the Federal
Government has not been funding the city for
terrorism. She believes because of our high
visibility the waterfront should have greater
security. She would also encourage the development
of the biotech industry especially in the field
of stem cell research.
She has been trying to work with the Lucas Center
and Verizon on the placement of a Cellular Base
Station. There will be a meeting May 13 and
the community voice needs to be present.
Lori Brooke, President-elect, was introduced
and thanked Tony Imhof for his two year presidency.
Carol Livingston presented Tony with a hard
to find book on the history of Cow Hollow.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:15pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Nancy Leavens, Secretary
Back
to Top
Tell
a Friend
Become
a Member
All of the people reading this newsletter care about the unique
character of Cow Hollow and the special neighborhood we live
in. They have shown their support of the CHA by becoming members.
THANK YOU! Now pass along the good news.
If you know a neighbor or friend that lives within the association's
boundaries, please forward this eNewsletter. They may find
the topics interesting and possibly decide to join or even
attend a monthly meeting. If they want to join the Cow Hollow
Association (or rejoin for 2004), they can send their check
for $40 to: Cow Hollow Association, 2652 Broderick St., San
Francisco, CA 94123-4605 and be sure to include your telephone
number and email address.
Back
to Top
Next
Cow Hollow Association Meeting
Tuesday,
October 5, 2004 at 5:30pm
The CHA board and advisory members meet the first
Tuesday of each month at 5:30pm . The location rotates among
board members homes. We are always looking for new board
members who want share their talents and passion for the preservation
and improvement of our neighborhood. You are welcome to attend
a meeting to listen to the issues or bring up a topic of concern
to you. To attend a meeting, please contact the CHA President,
Lori Brooke at 415-749-1841 for the location.
Back
to Top
If
you wish to be removed from our mailing list, please click
here to respond. We will unsubscribe you immediately.
Privacy
Guarantee: Your information will never be given, rented or sold
to a third party. Your privacy will be respected with utmost regard.
©
Copyright 2004 Cow Hollow Association. All Rights Reserved.
|