www.cowhollowassociation.org
September 2004
Become a CHA Member

For more information:
info@cowhollowassociation.org

 

In This Issue

Updates

Verizon Wireless Base Station - Neighbors Prevail...Verizon Files Lawsuit

The Housing Element - City Passes Element, Next Step

Lucas Powerline - PG&E/Lucas EMF Feeder Study

Undergrounding Utility Wires on Greenwich and cross streets - Options for Neighbors


New Topics

Candidate Forum, District 2 Supervisor - October 18 at the Palace of Fine Arts

Traffic Calming Program - Reduce Disruption, Improve Safety

2004 Annual Meeting - Minutes from Meeting

Tell a Friend - Become a Member

Next Cow Hollow Board Meeting - October 5, 2004


The Cow Hollow Association was established many years ago to protect and preserve the residential character of one of San Francisco's distinctive neighborhoods.


Verizon Wireless Cellular Base Station

Neighbors Prevail...Verizon Files Lawsuit

On May 11th, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted unanimously (10-0, Ammiano absent) to revoke the permit granted by the Planning Commission for Verizon Wireless to erect a 3-G cellular site on top of the Pacific Motor Inn (corner of Lombard and Broderick). After 9 months of hearings, meetings and negotiations, the cohesive efforts of many neighbors along Greenwich and surrounding streets, lead by Mary Irene Zemanek and Lori Brooke, resulted in a victory that many thought wasn't possible. Supervisor Alioto-Pier was instrumental in our success by clearly supporting the neighborhood's position.

The victory was not long lasting. In mid-July, we learned from a Deputy City Attorney that Verizon has filed a lawsuit against the City for its recent decision in the antenna appeal for the Pacific Motor Inn. According to the attorney, it is likely Verizon will not pursue the lawsuit until the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issues a decision in the MetroPCS v. City & County of SF case, which concerns a 2002 Board of Supervisors decision to deny MetroPCS antennas at 17th Ave. & Geary. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has scheduled oral argument to take place in the MetroPCS v. City & County of San Francisco case on Monday, October 4, likely sometime after 10:00 a.m. at 95 Seventh St. in San Francisco.

This is the first antenna-siting case to be determined by the Ninth Circuit. It has far-reaching implications, not only locally (if the City loses, then disputed antenna sites now in litigation in the Sunset and Cow Hollow will be allowed to be installed), but throughout California and beyond. After the hearing is held, a decision will likely be issued at the end of this year or in the early part of 2005. The hearing is open to the public.

Most recently at the July 20, 2004 Board of Supervisors meeting, Supervisor Ma, along with Supervisors Ammiano and Dufty, called for a hearing on issues related to the revision of the City's antenna-siting guidelines. It was referred to the Land Use Committee, which has heard this issue in the past, and whose current members are Supervisors McGoldrick, Peskin and Maxwell. As soon as we learn of a firm date for the hearing, we will pass it along. The Land Use Committee generally meets Mondays at 1:00 p.m. in City Hall.

This situation is further proof that we, as concerned neighbors, need to pressure members of the Board of Supervisors to take action that would eliminate the need for these appeals by strengthening the City's antenna-siting guidelines. The CHA will remain involved in this effort and keep you informed of any developments.


Back to Top


The Housing Element

City Passes Element, Next Step

Despite opposition from several San Francisco neighborhood organizations, the San Francisco Housing Element has sailed through the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors. The Housing Element is a major part of San Francisco's General Plan that seeks to ensure adequate housing for current and future San Franciscans.

Its chief proponent, Gerald Green, Director of the Planning Department at that time, first presented the substance of the Housing Element to Cow Hollow at our 2003 annual meeting. At that meeting, he forewarned the members in attendance that the document would be controversial and it certainly is.

The philosophical premise of the Housing Element is based on two ideas:

(1) that the way to make housing in San Francisco more affordable is to build more of it (up to 20,000 units). The single family residence is an inefficient use of land and should be replaced with multi-family buildings allowing for greater density at affordable prices, and (2) a "public-transit first" policy takes precedence over the current requirement of 1:1 off-street automobile parking considerations.

The plan has proven controversial because it threatens to increase housing densities in residential neighborhoods like Cow Hollow without an increase in parking, thus disturbing the neighborhood character. Beyond that, this extensive plan to build 20,000 plus units was done without an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), which is required by State law. Despite the fact the Planning Department had EIRs done in 1983 and 1990 for the previous Housing Elements, the Planning Department simply issued what's called a Negative Declaration claiming that any impacts on the environment would be speculative.

The Housing Element was also prepared without any input from the neighborhoods that may be affected by the new policies. Although the Coalition of San Francisco Neighborhoods (CSFN) did negotiate amendments to the Housing Element with the Planning Department, the appellants did not agree to those amendments and the effectiveness of the amendments is doubtful.

For these reasons, and many others, neighborhood organizations came together to appeal the Negative Declaration and to demand an EIR. On May 13, 2004, the appellants, who included approximately 25 neighborhood organizations, testified at the Planning Commission hearing in hopes that the Planning Commission would insist that an EIR be prepared for the latest Housing Element.

However, the Planning Commission unanimously denied our appeal and approved the Planning Department's decision to issue the Negative Declaration in lieu of preparing an EIR. The Planning Commission then heard arguments on the Housing Element itself. As expected, the Commission approved the project without any consideration of the appellants' arguments.

The appellants then appealed to the Board of Supervisors, requesting an appeal of the Negative Declaration and the preparation of an EIR. The hearing took place on June 29, 2004. Despite extensive lobbying efforts, the appellants lost again with a 6-4 vote with Supervisor Sandoval absent. Our votes came from Supervisors Hall, Peskin, Ma and Alioto-Pier.

As it stands now, the appellants have written a letter to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) detailing why the Housing Element is not in compliance with state law. HCD reviews the Housing Element for compliance. The appellants are raising funds to commence a lawsuit to require an EIR before the City can finalize or implement these new housing policies. The alliance of neighborhoods has retained a noted environmental law specialist to prepare the record and represent the appellants in the suit. The lawyer will handle the lawsuit for a flat fee, which must be raised quickly.

For further information and a more detailed analysis, visit the Save Our Neighborhoods website at www.saveourneighborhoods.org. If you would like to contribute to the lawsuit, you can complete the form below and return it with your tax-deductible check payable to Appeal Legal Fund, PHRA, 2443 Fillmore Street #192, San Francisco, CA 94115. (Pacific Heights Residents Association is acting as depository). In the event a lawsuit is not brought, your donation will be returned.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name____________________________________________Phone________________

Address___________________________________________Zip Code____________

E-Mail___________________________________________FAX________________

Neighborhood Organization__________________________Amount_______________

Back to Top


Lucas Powerline

PG&E/Lucas EMF Feeder Study

James Andrews, Electrical Engineer, and Kristen Sparrow, MD, both of Mentor Associates, have initiated a comprehensive study to demonstrate and record any increase in Electric and Magnetic Fields (EMFs) along the Lucas Powerline - Lyon to Filbert to Pierce. This study has been generously paid for by a number of Cow Hollow residents and we thank you for your support. A complete list of supporters will be distributed with the next Newsletter. Information on contributing to this Study follows the Phase 1 information.

The Study will cover approximately one year's worth of readings and analyses taken along the street and at critical points such as taps and junction points. Any readings from the interiors of homes along the route could be done on a case by case after the "baseline" data is established. This can be arranged by contact Mr. Andrews directly at 415.265.9334.

Phase 1 Update (7/12/04) by James Andrews, Mentor Associates and Cow Hollow Resident

The main feeder along Filbert is now energized and was finally switched on via one of the newly installed, underground "primary" switches located in the sidewalk at the northeast corner of Filbert at Divisadero. PG&E "heated up" the entire feeder from the substation on Bay Street, and did not have to use that new overhead "riser" tap in front of the Cow Hollow Woodworks on Steiner at Filbert as an interim connection point as we surmised.

As expected, when PG&E energized the feeder, the EMF readings registered an initial increase along the Filbert portion of the feeder to an average range of .8 to 1.4mG. Some areas at key locations (i.e. over underground switches, etc.) are higher, but the fairly low initial readings are in line with what we predicted and that is encouraging. Initially "energizing" the new Lucas Feeder has not significantly added to the existing EMF along North Filbert/East Lyon, but the line is very minimally loaded now. We need to carefully monitor any changes as the Lucas load is steadily increased over the next several months.

The windows at the Lucas buildings 1-4 are almost all installed and I'd expect their electrical contractor to begin testing the "permanent" electrical system very soon. They will generally leave a majority of the lights, etc. on to test the systems and we'll try to get another full set of measurements along the feeder to coincide with the increased load. The large, temporary transformers being used for all of the "temporary construction service" to the Lucas site are still in place and remain functional. Apparently, they are not yet being supplied from the new main feeder.

The other "riser tap" (and transfer switch) at the intersection of Lyon and Greenwich is still not complete and the large set of 3 -1100kcm Aluminum cables are coiled on the pole. Curiously, this existing wooden pole already has a riser on it, which is, presumably, one of the existing main primary feeds for the Presidio. It will be interesting to see when/if this existing feed is removed, as combining two feeders and switches on a single pole like that is generally not considered the best design for prudent "outage prevention".

Also, along those lines, this "key" riser pole is directly at the end of Greenwich and Lyon. This is a "T" intersection for vehicle traffic and is also a tight left turn and stopping point for the quite frequent #45 & #41 Muni Buses. Any unfortunate accident involving the pole could leave the existing neighborhood exposed to a prolonged power outage. With 2500-3000 new workers expected at Lucas and all the new auto traffic that will result, perhaps the wisdom of designing a key "riser" switch on this rather vulnerable pole should have been more carefully considered by PG&E.

As a result of CHA's efforts, PG&E finally located the large, pad mounted "capacitor" behind the wall on the Presidio property and not on a pole on our streets. It is installed just inside the Presidio wall on Lyon just North of Filbert, and is now operational and buzzing like crazy. Also, a realtor from Hill & Co. did confirm to me that the plan is for the Letterman Digital Arts Center buildings to be "one-third" subleased.

Attached are a few photos of that "riser" mentioned above at Lyon/Greenwich the first one shows the specifications including the "25KV" rating.

To Support the PG&E/Lucas EMF Feeder Study

We are well on our way to our final fundraising goal of $10,000 to implement our projects for reducing the impacts of the Lucas Powerline (Bay-Fillmore-Filbert-Lyon Streets) on our residential neighborhood.

We heartily thank those of you who have:
1. mailed in your tax-deductible contribution to support our efforts, or
2. volunteered their homes as part of the EMF study.

If you have not participated in our campaign, please mail your TAX-DEDUCTIBLE contribution as soon as possible to:

Cow Hollow Association, Inc.*
Box 471136, San Francisco, CA 94147

Any contribution will be greatly appreciated. Please write FOCH-EMF on your check.

* The Cow Hollow Association, Inc., with its tax-exempt status, is acting as the fiscal sponsor to raise funds for this effort - "Friends of Cow Hollow"

Back to Top


Undergrounding Utility Wires

Options for Neighbors

Supervisor Alioto-Pier's office held a meeting on May 12, 2004 for neighborhoods who are interested in underground wiring. Representatives from Greenwich Street and Jordan Park attended. Also present were Lester Rose (PG&E) and Barbara Moy (DPW).

Rule 20A funds are typically used to underground districts. Rule 20A is funded through rate payers and funds are then allocated by the State PUC. In 1996, a process began which legislated 42 miles throughout the city of San Francisco. Due to the increased costs of this project, San Francisco has had to borrow forward to 2018 to complete this project. Current estimated cost for this project is $135 million.

As a result, this leaves other areas of San Francisco, who are not part of the 42 miles, without access to 20A funds until 2018. Currently there is no process in place to apply for 20A funds after 2018 and we don't anticipate that DPW will institute a process anytime soon.

Supervisor Alioto-Pier arranged the meeting in order to share with neighbors another process by which they could underground wires through their own efforts. Costs would be born entirely by the neighbors and could be amortized over a period of years through property tax assessments. In order to do this it requires the following:

* Establish a Business Improvement District by gathering a minimum of 30% of the neighbor's signatures who are interested in having wires undergrounded.
* Conduct an Engineering and Business Plan report which includes:
- benefits added to property
- how the assessment will be allocated
- how the assessment will be funded
- why this is needed
- NOTE: cost of report can be incorporated into the bond
* Implement Legislation vote by ballot. Measure must pass by 50% +1 of weighted votes. If the initial petition has 50% +1 then a neighborhood does not need to go through an election by ballot.
* The city of San Francisco would then work with the neighborhood to issue tax free bonds to fund the undergrounding. This is then assessed through property taxes and the neighborhood decides on the length of time to repay.
* Cost per block for undergrounding is as follows:
- $500,000 for substructure
- $30,000 for streetlights
- $20,000 legislation and street light design
- Conversion cost for:
Single family home $2500
Two unit flat - $3500
Building - $6000-7000

Another option to pass legislation for undergrounding (that is neighborhood funded) is to get a two-thirds majority vote by registered voters in the proposed undergrounding area - called a Melarouse. This option, according to Supervisor Alioto-Pier's office, is not typically used.

As you can tell, this is going to be a difficult process and the neighbors need to determine what efforts and costs they are willing to take to make the undergrounding happen in this area. The CHA will keep you informed of any efforts to begin this process.

Back to Top


Candidate Forum, District 2 Supervisor


October 18 at the Palace of Fine Arts Theatre

The November election is nearing and do you know about the candidates for our District 2 Supervisor? Do you know where they stand on issues of importance to our neighborhood such as the Housing Element, Parking and Traffic, Antenna Siting Guidelines, or the Impact of the Presidio?

To help you make an informed decision, the Cow Hollow Association, Golden Gate Valley and Neighbors in Action (NIA) will co-host a forum for District 2 Supervisor candidates. Here is your chance to hear first hand from the candidates who are competing to represent our interests.

Date Monday, October 18  
Place Palace of Fine Arts Theatre  
Time 6-7pm
  • Refreshments
  • Lombard Beautification Discussion
  • Parking & Traffic Discussion
7-9pm
  • District 2 Candidate Forum

See you there.


Traffic Calming Program

Reduce Disruption, Improve Safety

Cow Hollow Association board will soon be submitting an application to the San Francisco Department of Parking and Traffic's Traffic Calming Program. This program is designed to help neighborhoods, through community planning processes, develop solutions to various traffic hazards. Neighborhood-wide traffic calming improvements are underway in Bernal Heights and are planned for Jordan Park and Japantown. Specific projects, such as speed humps and traffic circles, can be seen on West Clay Park, West Pacific, Cervantes, and Page Street.

As relevant to Cow Hollow, the program recognizes the need to reduce the hazards to residential neighborhoods from "cut-through" traffic trying to save time by avoiding major arteries. The blocks between the Presidio and Divisadero have experienced change in the past year -- good for some blocks, bad for others. The closing off of Lyon Street reduced much of the cut-through" traffic using Lyon and Green Streets as a way to avoid some of the congestion on Lombard and Divisadero. Baker Street soon saw increases, and neighborhood efforts resulted in the installation of "calming" poles designed to discourage the use of Baker as a substitute for Lyon. Speeding taxis and other commercial drivers have been observed in recent months roaring at inappropriate and unsafe speeds up Broderick and along Filbert and Greenwich. When the Lucasfilm Ltd. facility in the Presidio opens for business, we expect further changes in neighborhood traffic -- and not reductions, unfortunately.

We hope that by taking the pro-active step of working together to develop solutions to Cow Hollow's traffic problems, we can make Cow Hollow a safer place for walking, cycling and driving. We will keep you informed of any neighborhood meetings to discuss these issues with DPW.

For more information about the Traffic Calming Program, please visit: http://www.ci.sf.ca.us/site/dpt_index.asp?id=13568.

Back to Top


2004 Annual Meeting

Minutes from Meeting

Cow Hollow Association
Annual Meeting, May 4, 2004
St. Francis Yacht club

The meeting was called to order by President Tony Imhof at 6:15pm.
He introduced the current Board. The outgoing Board members: Amanda Kirkwood, Terry Laurentine and Alison Salzer were thanked. He also thanked the informational booths that were represented:

- GGNRA/Presidio trust
- Doyle Drive and their video
- Marina Library Renovation
- EMF
- SAFE
- Save Our Neighborhoods, information on the proposed Housing Element

The minutes of the May 6,2003 meeting were approved as written.

Nominating Committee Report: Carol Livingston
Nominees for the Board were introduced. Nominated for a two-year term were: Lori Brooke, Tony Imhof, Brooke Sampson, and new members, Marina Ehlers, Fredric Laurentine, and Catherine Stefani. Continuing their second of two years were: Sue Crawford, Charlie Dicke, Nancy Leavens, Peter O'Hara and Elizabeth Traub. Motion to approve was passed.

Carol reminded all members that we are a volunteer organization and everyone is invited to our monthly meetings and encouraged to become involved with our neighborhood.

Treasurer's Report: Lori Brooke
Our balance at the beginning of May 2003 was $11, 800.00. Our income is derived from membership dues and our expenses include our annual party, mailings, development of a website and a donation to Save Our Neighborhoods. Our closing balance as of April 30,2004 was $13,033.00.

Members were encouraged to provide the membership chair with their e-mail address since this greatly cuts down on expenses.

Presenter: Heather Fong, San Francisco Police Chief
Chief Fong is a San Francisco native, has a Master's Degree from San Francisco State, and has been a member of the San Francisco Police Force for 27 years. Currently we have 10 police districts and the Force has an expanded presence at Treasure Island and Hunter's Point because of the development of housing.

Chief Fong detailed some of the innovations in the Department:

  • More sophisticated computer technology allows for improvement in administration
  • Crime reports are now being filed electronically.
  • Implementation of a new crime mapping system that allows for greater accountability and evaluates high areas of crime so the districts can adjust staffing.
  • A link to the Police Department from the government website, www.sfgov.org. This will allow citizens to be more informed.
  • Greater emphasis on traffic enforcement, especially speeding. The California Highway patrol is now working with local law enforcement. The motorcycle unit has expanded as well as the neighborhood bicycle patrol.
  • And forthcoming: Continued training for officers for crowd control and protection for conferences and special events.
  • Outreach for expanded citizen involvement through volunteer opportunities and local community meetings.
  • The Department is working closely with the Mayor's office, the Department of Human Services and the Department of Health on the problem of homeless people. Proposition M prohibited aggressive panhandling and the Department will be enforcing it. After prosecution and conviction, people will be diverted to the appropriate City service.
  • Cow Hollow, within the context living in a major City is considered a safe neighborhood.

Presenter: Michela Alioto-Pier, San Francisco Supervisor, District #2
Supervisor Alioto-Pier graduated from UCLA with a degree in Anthropology. She has been an aide to Al Gore and has run for state office. Currently she is on the Port Commission. She is a fifth generation San Franciscan and is married with two children.

Supervisor Alioto-Pier describes herself as a voice for children and an advocate for the disabled.
She is concerned about continued job development and growth and the problem of affordable housing. She would encourage the development of San Francisco as a cruise ship port. Because San Francisco is not considered a cargo port, the Federal Government has not been funding the city for terrorism. She believes because of our high visibility the waterfront should have greater security. She would also encourage the development of the biotech industry especially in the field of stem cell research.

She has been trying to work with the Lucas Center and Verizon on the placement of a Cellular Base Station. There will be a meeting May 13 and the community voice needs to be present.

Lori Brooke, President-elect, was introduced and thanked Tony Imhof for his two year presidency. Carol Livingston presented Tony with a hard to find book on the history of Cow Hollow.

The meeting was adjourned at 7:15pm.

Respectfully submitted,
Nancy Leavens, Secretary

Back to Top


Tell a Friend

Become a Member


All of the people reading this newsletter care about the unique character of Cow Hollow and the special neighborhood we live in. They have shown their support of the CHA by becoming members. THANK YOU! Now pass along the good news.

If you know a neighbor or friend that lives within the association's boundaries, please forward this eNewsletter. They may find the topics interesting and possibly decide to join or even attend a monthly meeting. If they want to join the Cow Hollow Association (or rejoin for 2004), they can send their check for $40 to: Cow Hollow Association, 2652 Broderick St., San Francisco, CA 94123-4605 and be sure to include your telephone number and email address.

Back to Top


Next Cow Hollow Association Meeting

Tuesday, October 5, 2004 at 5:30pm

The CHA board and advisory members’ meet the first Tuesday of each month at 5:30pm . The location rotates among board member’s homes. We are always looking for new board members who want share their talents and passion for the preservation and improvement of our neighborhood. You are welcome to attend a meeting to listen to the issues or bring up a topic of concern to you. To attend a meeting, please contact the CHA President, Lori Brooke at 415-749-1841 for the location.

Back to Top


If you wish to be removed from our mailing list, please click here to respond. We will unsubscribe you immediately.

Privacy Guarantee: Your information will never be given, rented or sold to a third party. Your privacy will be respected with utmost regard.


© Copyright 2004 Cow Hollow Association. All Rights Reserved.